Connect with us

news

THE MENTION OF THE NAME, PERE OF OLODIAMA CLAN, EVOKES UGLY MEMORIES

Published

on

        In 1986, one Timothy Ofunama, issued a statement saying that Gelegele belonged to Ijaw and that the Oba of Benin had no jurisdiction over it in the welcome address I presented when Omo N’Oba Ewuare II visited Obazuwa on January 28, I enumerated some of the provocative acts of the Ijaws. We wish to state some of them here again.

        In 1985, Philips Oil Company established business in Ughoton. It built a Flow Station in Gelegele. Ijaw fishermen, who lived in stilt-houses around the swamps, came out and began to supply labour to the company. Many of the Benin youths in Ughoton and Gelegele had left the villages in search of a better life in the City. When they heard of the new company and the job opportunities if offered, they returned home to seek employment. The Ijaws were not happy at their return. They feared they would displace them (the Ijaws) in competition for jobs. Suddenly, they attacked the returnees. The attack was so violent and widespread that the government setup an administrative panel, headed by Mr. S. Jamgbadi, a Senior District Officer, to look into it. Part of the panel’s report reads:

“… it is however established that the Ijaws have been resident in Gelegele for many years and that during these years they have acquired landed property and cultivate farms but from the facts in evidence they qualify as TENANTS on the land  their long period of occupation notwithstanding…”

        The Ijaws were not done yet with agitation. They agitated again, the same year, against Philips Company itself. The cause of the agitation was that the company also gave employment to non-Iyaw persons. Government again set up an inquiry to look into the crisis. Part of the panel’s report reads:

“… The inquiry further revealed that the claims by the Ijaws to the monopoly of employment provided by the oil company are not only unpatriotic but also preposterous. The Ijaws have no right whatsoever to prevent the oil company from employing persons of their choice; they should stop threatening the oil company from employing other persons who are not Ijaw…”

        On Thursday, November 20, 1986, as said earlier, Timothy Ofunama, in the publication in the Nigerian Observer said that Gelegele belonged to Ijaw and that the Oba of Benin had no jurisdiction over it. The government reacted to the publication through a press statement issued by the Honourable Commissioner for Local Government, Engr. Enoch Ejofodomi. I reproduce the statement here in full.

1.     My attention has been drawn to a publication at page 4 of the Nigerian Observer Newspaper of Thursday, 20th November, 1986 titled “Public Notice” and credited to one Timothy Ofunama who styled himself as the “Ama-Okosuwei of Gelegele”. In which he gave the impression that the traditional administration of Gelegele was under the “Pere of Olodiama Clan” and other Ijaw Chiefs in Ovia Local Government Area of Bendel State.

2.     From records available in my Ministry, there is no chieftaincy title known as the “Pere of Olodiama Clan” in Ovia Local Government Area. Also there are no chieftaincy titles known as “Ama-Okosuwei of Gelegele” and “Amanana-Owei of Gelegele”, as claimed in the above mentioned publication. In this regards the Government couldn’t have appointed anybody to these non-existent chieftaincy stools.

3.     The author of the above mentioned vexations publication also gave the impression that the Oba of  Benin has no right to confer the chieftaincy title of “Okao of Gelegele” on Chief I. Iyonmahari and that Gelegele and some other Ijaw towns in Ovia Local Government Area are not under the jurisdiction of the Oba of Benin. In this regard, my Ministry wants to make it abundantly clear that the Oba of Benin who is the traditional paramount ruler in Benin kingdom is the Prescribed Authority for Oredo, Orhionmwon and Ovia Local Government Areas by virtues of Bendel State Legal Notice 44 of 1979 published in the Bendel State Legal Notice 44 of 1979 published in the Bendel State of Nigeria Extraordinary Gazette No. 51. Vol. 16 of 28th, September, 1979; He therefore acted within his constitutional powers: as the prescribed Authority for the area ‘when he appointed Chief I. Iyonmahan as the Okao of Gelegele. It is also pertinent to point out that Gelegele in Ovia Local Government Area is part and parcel of Bini land under the jurisdiction of the Oba of Benin having regard to the judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria delivered on 11th August, 1983 which made it clear that the land known as Gelegele belongs to the Binis.

4.     In the light of the foregoing, Government sews the action of Timothy Ofunama who calls himself the “Ama-Okosuwei of Gelegele” as an attempt to incite the law abiding Ijaw citizens in Gelegele against their host as capable of causing serious disaffection among the entire community in that part of Ovia Local Government Area. I want to stress that Government will not tolerate that state of affairs which is capable of jeopardizing the peace, order and good government in the area.

5.     For the purpose of clarification, it is considered necessary to inform the general public that it is not only contemptuous to reopen an issue on which the Supreme Court had already delivered judgment but that it is also unlawful for anyone to call himself a chief or allow himself to be so called or addressed if he has not been conferred with a chieftaincy title by a competent authority and has not been registered by the Ministry of Local Government as a Chief.

6.     Finally, I want to warn that all those who are party to the aforementioned publication should desist forthwith from parading themselves either as traditional rulers or as traditional chiefs as the penalty for their actions under Sections 20 and 26 of the Traditional Rulers and Chiefs Law, 1979 is imprisonment for six months and two years respectively without an option of a fine.

(Engr. Enoch Ejofodomi)

Commissioner for Local Government

Ministry of Local Government

Benin City.

10th December 1986

        The Ijaws still claim ownership of Gelegele. Yet, the question of who owns Gelegele had gone through litigation and had long been settled.

        At the High Court of Justice, Benin, in suit B/44/1970, Judgment was delivered in favour of Benins by Honourable Justice Ekeruche on December 22, 1978. Part of the judgment reacts.

        “…finally, I enter judgment in this case as follows: for the avoidance of all doubts, argument or controversy, I hear say unequivocally, that Gelegele village and its environs and bushes are Benin land. They do not belong to the Ijaws of Gelegele as owners. The Ijaws are tenants of His Highness Akenzua II the Oba of Benin. Apart from above, the plaintiffs’ claims are dismissed in their entirety”.

Dissatisfied with the judgment, the Ijaws went to the Court of Appeal, Benin. The court dismissed their appeal and delivered judgment in favour of Benin. The lead judgment was read by Honourable Justice Abdul Ganiyu Agbaje on December 16, 1981.

Still on satisfied, they headed for the Supreme Court. In Suit SC. 131/1/1982, Honourable Justice, Muhamadu Lawani Uwais (CJN) and four (4) others, on August 19, 1983 also dismisses their appeal and up-held the judgment of the lower courts. The CJN concluded thus:

“… For three reasons I am of the opinion that the appellants’ argument in support of the sole ground of appeal should be discountenanced. The appeal therefore fails and it is dismissed with N300.00 costs to the respondents. The decision of the Federal Court of Appeal is affirmed…”

The Supreme Court awarded costs against the Ijaws. Despite these judgments, the various reports and government statements, the Ijaws still claim ownership of Gelegele!

In 1987, they attacked Benin indigenes in Iko and Isekiri and Urhobo settlers there. They destroyed the Ogua-edion in Iko, they moved up-hill, to Ikonoke and unleashed mayhem. Benin indigenes in Ikonoke and in Ikonugboghodo fled, giving room to the Ijaws to entrench themselves in both places. At that time and up till the early 90s, one Pa Igbinosun, a Benin man, was the Odionwere of Iko, they have forayed into Agbomoba, Ozomu, Igbobi, Ekete, Ite, Orogo, Ewudu, Abiala, Eki-ohuan (now known as Ekewan), Okomu and Gelegele. They maim the Benin people in these communities and destroy their properties.

In June 2011, we, offered a parcel of land to Edo State government for the erection of a model school block. The Government sent a team led by the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Education, then Mrs. Idaho is now the Head of Service. In anticipation of the inspection, we directed Obazuwa boys to demarcate the plot. As the boys were measuring it, Ijaws militants descended on them with machetes, guns, and clubs. Without any provocation, they brutalized the boys and abducted two of them. Obazuwa boys were unnamed and defenseless.

We sent an S.O.S to the Governor who directed his Chief of Staff, then Barr. Osarodion Ogie, to take up the matter with the Commissioner of Police. The Police Commissioner promptly dispatched a team of policemen from Evbotubu Police Station to rescue the abducted boys. He sent another team from SARS to arrest the militants who brutalized the boys, destroyed their motorcycles and a car. Those arrested were charged to Okada Magistrate’s Court where the case is still pending up till now.

In order to strengthen their claim of ownership of Gelegele, they have now coined names, Gelegelegbene and Gelegele-ama. These names are new. In all their previous write-ups and the dispatches by early European visitors. Gelegele had always been known and spelt as Gelegele. The use of Gelegelegbene and Gelegele-ama which they have only recently coined is ludicrous and intellectually dishonest.

Our people got judgment in the Supreme Court 34 years ago. Now they want to claim their judgment right. Those who were driven away from their homeland, Abiala, and Ikon’oke, want to return home. They want to erect a house in Gelegele for the Okao of Gelegele who was installed there by the Oba of Benin.

The Edo State Ijaws are bellicose, belligerent, militant, quarrelsome and unfriendly. They are fighting the Itsekiris in Warri; they are fighting the Urhobos, the Ibibios and the Ilajes. They are claiming land whereas they traditionally live in swamps along the coastal areas in houses they build on stilts.

The so-called Beni-Ebe, Toru-Ebe Kengama and Abadi States which they requested the Senate to create for them in 2009, traverses the whole of the Nigerian coastline, encroaching of Benin, Ibibio, Ilaje and Itsekiri territories.

We plead for your support in curbing the Ijaw aggressiveness and in enforcing the Supreme Court Judgment for which the Ijaws have rudely insulted the highest court in the Country, Honourable Justice, and the Chief Justice of Nigeria whom they contemptuously described as fraudulent.

This press statement was endorsed by HRH Prince Edun Akenzua, MFR, FNGE, Ogie-Obazuwa and six other Enigie for on behalf of 48 communities in the affected areas in the Benin Kingdom.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

news

Update : FG Explains $21bn Borrowing Plan, Points to Infrastructure Deficit

Published

on

The Federal Government on Wednesday defended its $21.7bn supplementary external borrowing plan submitted to the National Assembly, describing it as a strategic investment programme rather than debt accumulation.

It revealed that the administration it succeeded had printed over N30tn, equivalent to more than $20bn at the time, and the country is still absorbing its inflationary impact.

The Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, made the claim when he briefed State House correspondents after the Federal Executive Council meeting presided over by President Bola Tinubu at the State House, Abuja.

Oyedele, who spoke on the state of the economy, had presented 10 memos, all of which were approved by the council.

The first, he said, was a €155.9m credit facility from Deutsche Bank and other banks to upgrade 132/33kV substations under the Presidential Power Initiative Phase One, which he said would improve power reliability for homes and businesses and lower energy costs. The second was a $970m syndicated term loan from Standard Chartered and the Africa Finance Corporation for rolling stock on the Karu–Maradi rail line, intended to boost freight, regional trade, and the Northern Economic Corridor while reducing logistics costs.

The third was a €76.8m credit from the ECOWAS Bank for Investment and Development to Bauchi State for a transport infrastructure development programme, covering rural and urban roads and farm-to-market access routes to support food security.

The fourth was an approval for non-intrusive inspection scanners for the Nigerian Customs Service to speed up cargo clearance, reduce smuggling and misdeclaration, and intercept contraband and small arms.

He explained, “As I said, there were 10 of them. I’ll just briefly speak to about four of them. One of them was a 155.9 million euro credit from Deutsche Bank and some other banks directed at upgrading about 132/33 kV substations and a few other ones. There are five of them, actually, five new ones under the Presidential Power Initiative Bash One. Essentially, this is a government intervention that will help ensure more reliable power for homes and businesses and lower energy costs.

“Another memo was with respect to a $970m syndicated term loan by Standard Chartered Africa Finance Corporation on rolling stock for the Karu-Maradi rail line. What is the essence of this? This will give us shipper freight, regional trade, the Northern Economic Corridor and lower prices for logistics, inflation and price levels.

“Another one was 76.8 million euros. This is from the ECOWAS Bank, and it is credit to Bauchi State for the Transport Infrastructure Development Programme, and this is going to help us with rural and urban roads, and to build farm-to-market access roads that will help with food security.

“And finally, council approved the investment in a non-intrusive inspection scanner for technical support, repairs, and maintenance to the Nigerian Customs Service. What is the essence of this? It will help with faster cargo clearance, less smuggling, and less misclassification. And we can then detect when some evil people want to bring in contraband and dangerous small weapons to our country.”

On the $21.7bn supplementary external borrowing plan, obtained by our correspondent from a presidential aide, Oyedele pushed back against critics who had described it as debt, insisting that the Tinubu administration was simply investing in critical infrastructure.

“So, another part of this presentation is on the borrowing plan that was presented to the National Assembly. Altogether, if you convert the euro amount and add it to the dollar amount, it comes to $21.7bn. And we’ve seen some people with commentary saying that we are borrowing X, Y, Z.

“I’m pleased and excited to inform you that actually this does not qualify as borrowing. This qualifies as investment, and I will explain that to you in the next few minutes. Now, so what is this all about? This is an amount or a plan.

“First and foremost, this is a plan. It doesn’t even mean that we borrow all of it. So it’s a plan. The average lifespan of the project under this plan is five years, by the way. So, this means countries need to plan. You can’t be doing everything based on spontaneity and randomness. Now, these amounts, about $10.6bn out of it, are for investment in transportation infrastructure,” he explained.

According to the document, the plan covers 46 projects across 11 sectors, with 29 on concessional or blended terms.

Transportation led with $10.6bn, including sections of the Lagos–Calabar and Sokoto–Badagry highways and the Kano–Kaduna Metro Rail. Ten flagship projects accounted for 58 per cent of the total, at $12.5bn.

The social sectors, agriculture, energy, social protection, climate, and education, totalling $4bn, will be funded entirely on concessional terms.

According to the document, about $7.9bn will come from multilateral and bilateral development partners, led by the World Bank with $5bn at an average rate of 2.1 per cent.

The remaining 11 lender groups include regional development finance institutions, export credit agencies, and commercial banks.

For the commercial component, the average indicative rate is 7.8 per cent, below the 9.1 to 9.6 per cent yield on Nigeria’s November 2025 Eurobond.

Oyedele attributed the gap to credit rating upgrades by Fitch, Moody’s, and S&P.

He noted that $4.8bn of the total was for subnational and agency borrowing, with $3.3bn going directly to states and $1.45bn channelled through agencies and development finance institutions including the Bank of Industry, Development Bank of Nigeria, Transmission Company of Nigeria, and electricity distribution companies.

“The Federal Government has the constitutional duty to be the interface for all external borrowing. So when people say we are borrowing $21.7bn, they need to know that a significant chunk is for states, the FCT, and agencies, not for the Federal Government alone,” he said.

Drawing a comparison with private sector financing, Oyedele argued that the plan would generate returns well in excess of its cost.

He argued, “If Aliko Dangote was going to save money to build his refinery, it would not have been built in his lifetime. He had to take the financing to make it happen. $20bn is now listed in less than four years, and the value has more than doubled. This is exactly what we are doing for our country.

“There are people who will tell you borrowing is bad. You just need to ask them: in which country on this planet do you run an economy without borrowing? To the extent that you borrow one naira to create value of more than one naira, you should please borrow more.”

On food price stability, which was adopted by the council as a priority resolution, Oyedele said the Federal Government was pursuing a national approach coordinated with state governments under the National Economic Council’s 90-day action plan.

“The short term is to ensure that in the coming months, leading up to the end of the year, the price of the most important staple items, rice, yam, beans, maize, remains stable or comes down,” he said.

He said the government would map the gap between local consumption and local production to calibrate targeted imports, adding that only unprocessed brown rice would be imported to preserve local milling jobs and processing capacity.

Over the medium and long term, the plan envisaged expanded irrigation farming to allow year-round agricultural production, improved crop yields through science, and significant reduction of post-harvest losses.

“We will not only be food sufficient; prices will be stable and affordable, and we will export, and a lot of it will be processed before we export. There is nothing that says people cannot be rich doing farming. This is the level we are getting into,” Oyedele said.

Speaking earlier, Oyedele contrasted the state of the economy in May 2023, describing Nigeria as having been weeks away from a full economic collapse when the Tinubu administration took office.

He said, “Inflation was at 22.41 per cent, and our reserve was net of $859m, not even enough to cover one month of imports. We had a spread between the official rate and the parallel rate of over 60 per cent premium, enabling round-tripping by the highly connected, while businesses, including manufacturers, could no longer access foreign exchange.

“We had printed altogether over N30tn to spend, and the impact of that amount, at the time, this was more than $20bn, is what we are dealing with today in inflationary pressure. Debt service at the time was consuming 97 per cent of revenue, nearly 100 per cent, and about 27 states could no longer reliably pay salaries. They were owing arrears of pension and gratuities.”

He said without the reforms, Nigeria would have slipped into hyperinflation and a full currency collapse far more severe than the devaluation that has taken place.

On petrol subsidy removal, Oyedele traced the policy to 1973, noting that a litre of premium motor spirit sold for six kobo then and N195 when the subsidy was removed in 2023, a 3,050-fold increase over 50 years that never resolved the underlying problem.

“Each time we increased the PMS price, Nigerian people suffered for it, but no benefit came. This is the first time in that half-century that the problem has now been solved, and the benefits are now accruing to our country,” he said.

The minister said growth had accelerated from 2.74 per cent in May 2023 to 4.43 per cent as of the second quarter of 2026, more than 60 per cent improvement, and Nigeria’s dollar-term growth rate in the first half of 2026 stood at 17 per cent, placing it among the world’s fastest-growing economies.

“This is the reason why we are classified by the IMF as one of the top 10 countries in the world contributing to global GDP growth,” he said.

On inflation, Oyedele said the September 2026 print of 14.63 per cent was down from 20.98 per cent a year ago and from a peak of about 34 per cent at the height of the inflationary pressure.

He added that month-on-month food inflation had fallen by 1.55 per cent, describing it as deflation in food prices.

Foreign reserves, he said, had risen to an 18-year high of over $55bn, with net reserves now exceeding $45bn, up from less than $1bn three years ago, a 45-fold increase.

The naira, currently trading between N1,330 and N1,350 to the dollar, was projected to appreciate further.

“Even the IMF estimates that the naira is about 25 per cent undervalued. So anybody who wants to bet against the naira should make provision for their losses. The currency to hold is the naira, even more than the US dollar or pound sterling,” Oyedele said.

He said the tax-to-GDP ratio rose from barely 7 per cent in 2023 to about 12.5 per cent at the end of 2025, while the debt service-to-revenue ratio fell from 97 per cent to under 60 per cent and was still declining.

Federation Account allocation grew 44 per cent from 2024 to 2025, with a projected 50 per cent growth from 2025 to 2026, and a real growth rate, stripping out inflation, of over 80 per cent across the two years.

Internationally, he said Fitch, Moody’s, and S&P had all upgraded Nigeria’s credit rating, with outlooks recently adjusted from stable to positive. Nigeria had also exited the Financial Action Task Force grey list and the European Union’s deficiency list, he added.

Responding to what he described as a recurring question about the gap between macroeconomic improvements and the lived experience of average Nigerians, Oyedele cited a series of direct interventions.

He stated, “To date, we have N372.6bn disbursed through NELFUND to more than 1.5 million students, which means their parents and guardians do not have to worry about tuition and stipend. We have more than 10 million households that have received cash transfers worth more than N600bn, and the target is to reach at least 15 million households,” he said.

Over 800,000 micro, small, and medium enterprises had received single-digit subsidised loans, mostly through the Bank of Industry, he added. Also, low-income earners earning up to N100,000 per month had been exempted from personal income tax, while small businesses with annual turnover of not more than N100m, representing about 97 per cent of over 40 million small businesses, were exempted from corporate income tax, VAT obligations, and withholding tax deductions.

The minister also noted that the capital market had grown from about N30tn to over N160tn, a more than fivefold increase in three years, and that more than 90 per cent of capital market investors were small investors who had been granted capital gains tax exemptions.

Council, he said, adopted a resolution to target single-digit inflation by the end of 2027 or earlier, stabilise and reduce food prices, and sustain fiscal discipline through the election cycle.

Oyedele’s defence comes amid criticism of President Bola Tinubu’s request to the National Assembly for approval of the loan plan.

The presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress, Atiku Abubakar, the Makinde/Daura Campaign Council and others have criticised the Federal Government’s borrowing plan.

On Tuesday, Atiku urged the National Assembly to suspend consideration of the request until the Federal Government made public the projects the loans were intended to finance.

Continue Reading

news

Tinubu in Kaduna: Opposition Created Hunger, Poverty; We’re Working to End Them

Published

on

President Bola Tinubu has blamed his political opponents for hunger and poverty in Nigeria, saying his administration is working to address the challenges.

Tinubu spoke on Saturday at the All Progressives Congress presidential campaign flag-off rally at Ranchers Bees Stadium in Kaduna State ahead of the 2027 general elections.

“I have an argument. I hear my opponent talking about hunger, poverty. Who created it? They did! They created the hunger, they created the poverty. We are trying to eradicate it,” the President said.

He also defended his administration’s record on salary payments and praised governors for their performance.

Nigeria’s debt interest payments exceed revenue by ₦1.5 trillion

“We pay salaries regularly. Our governors are working. I am proud of them. They are developing,” he said.

Continue Reading

news

Akume: North Should Support Tinubu in 2027, Presidential Turn Comes in 2031

Published

on

The Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator George Akume, has said the North should support President Bola Tinubu for a second term in 2027.

He insisted that any Northerner seeking the presidency in 2027 would be working against the region’s interests.

Akume said the North should allow Tinubu to complete his political project before considering another presidential bid in 2031.

The SGF stated this on Saturday while addressing Benue State indigenes resident in Kaduna ahead of the flag-off of the All Progressives Congress presidential campaign in the state capital.

He urged Northerners to remain united and resist political ambitions capable of dividing the region ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Add us to your Preferred Sources
“The North must remain united and focus on its collective interest rather than allow individual ambitions to divide us,” Akume said.

The former Benue State governor argued that the region needed to consider its long-term political interests and the implications of the 2027 presidential election for its future.

He said, “President Bola Tinubu should be allowed to complete his political project before the North considers its own presidential ambition in 2031.”

Akume also cautioned against attempts to divide Northerners along political, religious and personal lines, stressing that unity remained essential to the region’s political relevance.

“We must not allow political, religious or personal differences to undermine our common interests. The strength of the North lies in our ability to work together,” he said.

The SGF further called for peaceful coexistence and cooperation among Nigeria’s diverse ethnic and religious communities, saying national development depended on unity.

He urged the people to examine political developments carefully and avoid being misled by individuals whose ambitions might conflict with the broader interests of the region.

The meeting brought together Benue indigenes living in Kaduna and other political stakeholders to discuss issues affecting their community, political representation and engagement with leaders at the national level.

The APC presidential campaign flag-off in Kaduna is expected to bring together party leaders, supporters and political stakeholders from across the country.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Newsthumb Magazine | All rights reserved