Connect with us

news

Update : INEC job: Onochie’s rejection good for democracy

Published

on

Civil Society groups, eminent Nigerians and opposition figures on Tuesday described the rejection of presidential aide Lauretta Onochie’s nomination as Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) national commissioner as a victory for democracy.

They said the Senate has restored its integrity and restored hope in democracy.

The committee as reported by this newspaper recommended the rejection of Onochie because his nomination runs against the federal character principle.

When the recommendation was put to voice by Senate President Ahmad Lawan during plenary, the ‘nay’ response was unanimous and unmistaken.

Lawan consequently hit the gravel to ratify the vote and disqualify Onochie.

Prof. Muhammed Adam’s nomination was stepped down while five other nominees were cleared.

The nominees confirmed are: Prof. Muhammed Kallah (representing Katsina State), Prof. Kunle   Ajayi (Ekiti),  Seidu Ahmad (Jigawa State), Dr. Baba Bila (Northeast), and Prof. Abdullahi Zuru (Northwest).

The Centre for Transparency Advocacy (CTA), Coalition of Northern Groups (CNG) and Democracy Vanguard of the Citizenship Civic Awareness Centre (CCAC)  expressed support for the action. So also was the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

Onochie’s nomination in 2020 for the job by President Muhammadu Buhari had been widely criticised by many, including the PDP and a former INEC Chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega, on the grounds that it would  affect the neutrality of INEC as an electoral umpire.

The PDP went a step further to petition the Senate Committee on INEC, asking for her disqualification.

At Tuesday’s plenary to confirm seven nominees as INEC commissioners, members said no to Onochie and stepped down the clearance of  Prof.  Sani  Adam (North Central) to allow for further legislative action.

The decisions of the  Senate  followed the consideration of the report of its  Committee on INEC, presented by the Chairman, Kabiru Gaya.

Gaya said the committee rejected Onochie’s  nomination   because Mrs. May Agbamuche-Mbu currently represents Delta State as a national commissioner of INEC.

Oyebode, a former dean of the Law Faculty, University of Lagos,   said the decision to reject Onochie’s nomination had brought relief to the nation.

He said: “I think that Buhari should have learnt his lesson, eating the humble pie because his nominee did not cross the hurdle.

“The rejection of Onochie is a sign of the maturation of Nigerian democracy. At least, I am gladdened that Nigerian democracy is growing.

“Notwithstanding their reason for her rejection, her rejection has brought some sense of relief to Nigerians.

“It would have been a tragedy if the decision went the other way.  The ruling class in Nigeria should stop making avoidable mistakes.”

The PDP, in a   statement by its spokesman, Kola Ologbondiyan, described the  Senate’s decision as a triumph of the Nigerian people over an attempt by the Buhari administration to corrupt and hijack the commission ahead of the 2023 elections.

The statement read partly, “The party asserts that Onochie’s vexatious nomination, in total an affront to paragraph 14 of the 3rd schedule of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), was a very dangerous machination by the Buhari-led APC(All Progressives Congress) Presidency against our electoral process, in the attempt to subvert the will of the people in the 2023 elections.

”The APC, in spite of its shenanigans is aware that it will have difficulties winning election at any level in a free, fair, and credible election, and as such it is determined to rig every process ahead of the 2023 elections.”

It also urged”Nigerians not to rest on their oars but to continue in this spirit in fighting for our democracy, particularly in further resisting the attempt to alter the Electoral Act to prohibit direct electronic transmission of elections results from polling units.”

Fayose said Onochie’s rejection ”portends great hope for democracy.” Yesufu said she “wouldn’t put it past Buhari to send her name again’’ to the Senate for screening.

Both reacted through their Twitter handles.

Fayose wrote: “On rejection of Lauretta Onochie’s nomination as INEC Commissioner, I commend the Senate for listening to Nigerians.

”This portends great hope for democracy  and  I hope the NASS(National Assembly) can go further by subjecting itself more to what represents the interest of Nigerians.”

Yesufu said: “This is the second time Lauretta Onochie @Laurestar has been rejected by the Senate.  Wouldn’t put it past Buhari to send her name again.”

CTA, in its reaction, said the Senate has preserved INEC’s integrity. But it    asked  Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) and Nigerians to still be vigilant on the National Assembly’s ongoing consideration of the Electoral Bill.

The CTA, which made its position known in a statement by its Executive Director, Faith Nwadishi, said Onochie was rightly seen by Nigerians as partisan and toxic.

It added: “She  lacks the integrity to assume such office as a national commissioner and a policymaker in a sacred office like the Independent National Electoral Commission.

”The Senate has done the needful by listening to the voice of the people even though pressured by Nigerians to be accountable to the people and represent the interest of the people.”

To the CNG, the Senate acted in the national interest by rejecting Onochie.

CNG spokesman, Abdul-Azeez Suleiman, said: “The rejection of Onochie by the Senate shows that the federal legislature is beginning to live up to its expectation of not being a rubber-stamp for the executive.

“A person who is supposed to be an arbiter, a person who is expected to be a fair judge in an election should not have raised such controversy even before her appearance.

“Respectfully, if I were her, I would have just declined the offer because nobody would accept whatever she gives at the end of the election because of this controversy.

“I think what the Senate has done is in the national interest.”

The national coordinator of   CCAC,  Adeola Soetan, described Onochie’s nomination as an “anomaly”.

He said: “That nomination was an assault on people’s intelligence and an assault on civility.

“It is a good thing that the Senate has rejected the nomination. It also shows that even slaves when pushed to the wall will react appropriately. That is what the Senate has done.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

news

UPDATE: Tinubu Restates Directive on Withdrawal of Police Escorts from VIPs

Published

on

…orders engagement of NSCDC to replace police on VIP guard duties

…seeks conversion of grazing reserves to ranches

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on Wednesday reaffirmed his directive that police officers currently attached to VIPs be withdrawn and redeployed to conflict-prone areas, insisting that the nation cannot afford to keep essential security manpower away from pressing security theatres.

The President restated the order just before the commencement of the Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting at the State House, tasking relevant security agencies to immediately implement the directive to strengthen the ongoing fight against terrorism, kidnapping, and violent criminal activity across the country.

“I honestly believe in what I said, and I called the IGP… If you have any security problems because of the nature of the assignment, please contact the IGP and get my clearance,” President Tinubu said, pointing out that exceptional cases would be treated with approval.

He directed that the Ministry of Interior liaise with the Inspector General of Police and the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) to replace police personnel withdrawn from VIP protection duties.

“The Minister of Interior should liaise with the IGP and Civil Defence structure to replace those police officers who are on special security duties, so that you don’t leave people exposed,” he said.

The President further instructed the National Security Adviser (NSA) and the Department of State Services (DSS) to form a committee to review the structure and ensure full implementation of the redeployment plan.

“NSA and DSS to provide further information and form themselves into a committee and review the structure. It should be effected,” he said.

Expressing concern over the rising incidents of kidnapping and terrorism, President Tinubu stressed that all available manpower must be channelled to areas of need.

“We face challenges here and there of kidnapping and terrorism; we need all the forces that we can utilise,” he stated.

While acknowledging that special circumstances may require security considerations for some individuals, the President insisted that other armed formations must take up such responsibilities.

“I know some of our people are exposed… civil defence are equally armed and I want to know from the NSA to arm our forest guards too. Take it very seriously,” he added.

On the livestock sector, President Tinubu instructed Vice President Kashim Shettima to begin, through the National Economic Council (NEC), the process of identifying grazing reserves that can be rehabilitated into ranches or livestock settlements, describing the reform as a crucial step in ending perennial herder–farmer conflicts.

“Again, especially livestock reform, I think the Vice President should get the NEC first of all to see which villages or grazing reserves can be salvaged or rehabilitated into ranches, livestock settlement.” he said.

The President stressed that converting grazing areas into viable agricultural and commercial hubs would create jobs, expand economic opportunities, and end conflict cycles.

“We must eliminate the possibility of conflicts and turn the livestock reform into economically viable development. The opportunity is there, let’s utilise it,” he noted.

He reminded state governments of their constitutional authority over land and urged them to cooperate in the process.

“If we emphasize the constitutional requirement which says the land belongs to the states… whichever one they can salvage, convert to a livestock village or herders’ village. Let us stop this conflict area and turn it into economic opportunities and prosperity,” the President said.

The renewed directive comes amid the administration’s ongoing security overhaul and the push to modernise Nigeria’s livestock industry as part of broader agricultural reforms under the Renewed Hope Agenda.

Continue Reading

news

Awujale Family to KWAM 1: Provide Proof of Lineage or Stop Claim, Cautions Against ‘Strangers’

Published

on

The Fusengbuwa ruling house of Ijebu-Ode, next in line to produce the new Awujale of Ijebuland, Ogun State, has directed popular Fuji musician, Wasiu Ayinde, popularly known as KWAM 1, to complete the family’s royal lineage data form to establish his legitimate membership in the ruling house.

The Chairman of the ruling house and former National President of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria, Abdulateef Owoyemi, told our correspondence on Saturday that only bonafide members of the family would be allowed to participate in the selection process.

Ayinde, in a letter dated December 3, 2025, addressed to the chairman of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House in Agunsebi Quarters, Ijebu-Ode, announced his interest in the stool.

The Fuji icon described himself as a “bonafide son” of the ruling house, adding that his candidacy aligns with Ijebu customary law and the Ogun State Chieftaincy Laws.

The letter went viral on social media on Friday, sparking reactions from members of the public.

However, Owoyemi explained that the Olori Omooba of Ijebu land had been directed to complete the Fusengbuwa ruling house royal lineage data form.

He stressed that the form, which requires contenders to trace their genealogy back seven generations, ensures that only genuine princes from the family can participate, thereby blocking “strangers” from claiming the throne.

He said, “The first step for anyone interested in contesting for the Awujale throne is to declare their lineage by filling the standard Fusengbuwa ruling house royal lineage data form. Once confirmed as a legitimate member of the ruling house, they can then apply for the expression of interest form.

“We have told him, just like everyone else interested in the Awujale throne, that the first step is to declare his lineage. He will do this by completing the royal lineage data form, showing his full name, which parent and grandparent he descends from, and continuing up to seven generations.

“The completed form will be signed and submitted to the head of the ruling house unit of the Fusengbuwa ruling house, who will affirm that he is a genuine member. Only then will the process move forward.”

Although the application window for the throne officially closed on December 5, Owoyemi said KWAM 1 had been given an extension of five days, which would lapse on December 10.

“We won’t shut anybody out of picking the next Awujale, but we must ensure that you are a legitimate member of Fusengbuwa. Every right comes with responsibilities. For a royal family, everyone must prove their legitimacy by completing the royal lineage data form.

“When we receive the form, we will review it meticulously. If clarification is needed, we will contact the applicant. We welcome men of influence who will use their influence to enhance the throne, not to claim it, ensuring that what truly belongs to our family is preserved,” he said.

Owoyemi explained that the ruling house hoped to have a new Awujale by the second or third week of January 2026.

“The local government has given us 14 days to select candidates, which expires on December 18. After that, the kingmakers have seven days to deliberate and choose one candidate, whose name will be forwarded to the governor.

“Legally, the government then has 21 days to conduct background checks and security clearance, allowing for objections or protests. After this period, the State Executive Council will ratify the nominee, and the governor will announce the next Awujale, after which coronation rites will commence.

“So, combining the candidate selection, kingmakers’ deliberation, and legal objection period, we are looking at around 42 days. Therefore, we expect the next Awujale to emerge between the second and third week of January,” Owoyemi said.

The Fusengbuwa ruling house of Ijebu-Ode, next in line to produce the new Awujale of Ijebuland, Ogun State, has directed popular Fuji musician, Wasiu Ayinde, popularly known as KWAM 1, to complete the family’s royal lineage data form to establish his legitimate membership in the ruling house.

The Chairman of the ruling house and former National President of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria, Abdulateef Owoyemi, told our correspondence on Saturday that only bonafide members of the family would be allowed to participate in the selection process.

Ayinde, in a letter dated December 3, 2025, addressed to the chairman of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House in Agunsebi Quarters, Ijebu-Ode, announced his interest in the stool.

The Fuji icon described himself as a “bonafide son” of the ruling house, adding that his candidacy aligns with Ijebu customary law and the Ogun State Chieftaincy Laws.

The letter went viral on social media on Friday, sparking reactions from members of the public.

However, Owoyemi explained that the Olori Omooba of Ijebu land had been directed to complete the Fusengbuwa ruling house royal lineage data form.

He stressed that the form, which requires contenders to trace their genealogy back seven generations, ensures that only genuine princes from the family can participate, thereby blocking “strangers” from claiming the throne.

He said, “The first step for anyone interested in contesting for the Awujale throne is to declare their lineage by filling the standard Fusengbuwa ruling house royal lineage data form. Once confirmed as a legitimate member of the ruling house, they can then apply for the expression of interest form.

“We have told him, just like everyone else interested in the Awujale throne, that the first step is to declare his lineage. He will do this by completing the royal lineage data form, showing his full name, which parent and grandparent he descends from, and continuing up to seven generations.

“The completed form will be signed and submitted to the head of the ruling house unit of the Fusengbuwa ruling house, who will affirm that he is a genuine member. Only then will the process move forward.”

Although the application window for the throne officially closed on December 5, Owoyemi said KWAM 1 had been given an extension of five days, which would lapse on December 10.

“We won’t shut anybody out of picking the next Awujale, but we must ensure that you are a legitimate member of Fusengbuwa. Every right comes with responsibilities. For a royal family, everyone must prove their legitimacy by completing the royal lineage data form.

“When we receive the form, we will review it meticulously. If clarification is needed, we will contact the applicant. We welcome men of influence who will use their influence to enhance the throne, not to claim it, ensuring that what truly belongs to our family is preserved,” he said.

Owoyemi explained that the ruling house hoped to have a new Awujale by the second or third week of January 2026.

“The local government has given us 14 days to select candidates, which expires on December 18. After that, the kingmakers have seven days to deliberate and choose one candidate, whose name will be forwarded to the governor.

“Legally, the government then has 21 days to conduct background checks and security clearance, allowing for objections or protests. After this period, the State Executive Council will ratify the nominee, and the governor will announce the next Awujale, after which coronation rites will commence.

“So, combining the candidate selection, kingmakers’ deliberation, and legal objection period, we are looking at around 42 days. Therefore, we expect the next Awujale to emerge between the second and third week of January,” Owoyemi said.

Continue Reading

news

BREAKING: Appeal Court Rules VIO Cannot Stop or Impound Motorists’ Vehicles

Published

on

The Court of Appeal in Abuja has affirmed the October 4, 2024 judgment of a Federal High Court in Abuja barring the Directorate of Road Traffic Services (popularly called VIO) from further stopping, impounding, or confiscating vehicles on the road and imposing fines on motorists.

In a judgment on Thursday, a three-member panel of the appellate court resolved the three issues identified for determination against the appellant, the Directorate of Road Traffic Services.

Court warns EFCC boss over non-compliance with order to release 27 wrongly seized houses
Alleged criminal defamation: Court grants FG’s request to shift Natasha’s trial till next year
Read Also: Court strikes out stealing charge against businessman

Justice Oyejoju Oyebiola Oyewumi, who delivered the lead judgment, held that the appeal was without merit. She awarded a cost of N1million against the appellant and in favour of the respondent, a rights activist and public interest attorney, Abubakar Marshal.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Newsthumb Magazine | All rights reserved