Connect with us

news

EXPOSED: How BUA Shortchanges FG Billions In Sugar Imports

Published

on

BUA’s performance in the BIP already rated as poor and unacceptable by the National Sugar Development Council after the initial 4 years of BIP implementation continues to dip by the day, but its import quota on the other hand is rising, as the company appears more focused on importing raw sugar for its refinery which has been expanded recently.

In 2020 BUA got a 360,000mt presidential quota allocation, out of which it utilized 313,700mt and has now applied for 600,000mt import quota for 2021, without a complementary investment in backward integration, which is a pre-condition for enjoying increased import quota under the concessionary tariff.

At the end of the First Phase of the NSMP (2013-2016), BUA reportedly raked in N66.5billion profit from accrued tariff concessions and ploughed back only N9.3billion out of that into the BIP, a far cry from other investors who channelled a minimum of 50% back into the BIP.

Despite a 2017 radical review of the entire BIP strategy as well as the entire reward and sanction regime of the National Sugar Master Plan, which has placed emphasis on cultivation, jobs creation and local manufacture as a pre-requisite for quota allocation, BUA is yet to produce sugar locally like other stakeholders in the industry.

Cumulative Satellite monitoring data obtained from an anonymous source in the NSDC shows gross discrepancies between the self-reported performance figures (amount of land cultivated for sugar cane) by BUA’s Lafiagi Sugar Mill with what is actually on the ground verified by the satellite imagery.

BUA claims to have developed 6,500ha of land by May 2020 with 2,220 ha cultivated with sugar cane, however satellite images show that since 2016 only 473ha were developed and cultivated, despite enjoying billions in concessionary rights Nigerians are yet to see or have a taste of BUA sugar. A sugar factory without sugar cane represents a smoking gun for the Federal Government to investigate.

  • Sugar Council suspension Letter

A 2015 dated letter from the NSDC shows that BUA was slammed a suspension from enjoying the privileges of tariff concessions for failing to follow the examples of productive backward integration programs under the Nigeria Sugar Master Plan. Where other stakeholders were in re-investing profits from the tariff concessions into local sugar factories, BUA sugar rather was investing in the building of a new import-driven refinery in Port-Harcourt in flagrant disregard of the suspension of further sugar refinery development in the country.

What the country clearly needed at that time according to NSDC was an investment in sugarcane to sugar production to move the country out of its dependence on sugar imports, save foreign exchange and create jobs for Nigerians.

In another letter BUA was also denied an additional quota for raw sugar imports to service the new Port-Harcourt refinery by the NSDC, citing the need to protect the policy that was put in place to halt import dependency while stimulating investments, such as would harness the nation’s natural endowments for production of sugar from sugarcane.

The council also chided BUA for failing to demonstrate the level of commitment expected of him to justify the incentive being enjoyed from the federal government.

How the suspension after 2015 was lifted is still shrouded in mystery, as there has been no demonstrable commitment from BUA to drive the BIP, aside from projections and future dates of production, while it currently continues to enjoy tariff concessions on imports and has requested a quota increase from 313,700mt in 2020 to 600,000mt in 2021.

  • Sugar Council Statement On BUA Port Harcourt Sugar Refinery

Given the gravity of infractions from BUA and seemingly no penalty from regulators, would-be investors would be right to assume that there is no level playing ground in the BIP initiative.

The policy still has room to accommodate more private sector players that can ultimately turn the table from importation of raw sugar to local production, to self-sufficiency and net exporter of sugar if the government can show that it is carrying out its regulatory oversight function without fear or favour.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

news

Gymnastics Leadership Crisis: Stakeholders Insist on Transparent and Inclusive Election

Published

on

The outgoing President of the Gymnastics Federation of Nigeria (GFN) had earlier conducted an election which was later nullified by the National Sports Commission (NSC) for failing to meet the required legal standards.

The Director General of the National Sports Commission, Bukola Olopade, has promised to address and resolve the leadership crisis currently engulfing the Gymnastics Federation of Nigeria.

This follows renewed calls by one of the chairmanship candidates, Alhaja Kafilat Olalere, who insisted on a transparent and all-inclusive election to choose the executives of the federation.

The NSC had fixed dates for fresh elections on two different occasions, but both attempts failed to materialize. This left many delegates—who had converged on Abuja over the weekend to participate in elections into various sporting federations—bewildered and dissatisfied.

Speaking during the elections of other federations under the NSC, held in Abuja, Olopade said he would meet with the two key contenders in the GFN to resolve the crisis.

However, Olalere, who is contesting for the GFN presidency against Kelvin Erunmwase, maintained that the only way to resolve the impasse is to proceed with an election.

She emphasized that only a properly conducted election—one that allows all stakeholders to participate—would be acceptable to her.

Olalere told journalists that elections into other federations had been encouraging and peaceful.

She said:

“We are just not happy that our federation’s election did not hold. That is, the Gymnastics Federation of Nigeria. We received correspondence from the Sports Commission that there would be an election on the 25th.

Every delegate who was elected and expected to vote is here. Everybody came from across the nation, only to be told that there would be no election.

But we have not been informed as to why the election is not going to hold. Hopefully, before the end of the entire election process, we will get feedback on when it will be conducted. People have come in from every state of the federation to participate, so we are still waiting. The election is still very much in process—the day is still young.”

Responding to the DG’s promise to resolve the crisis through dialogue between the two candidates, Olalere said:

“No, it has to be an election. We’ve had enough round tables and back-and-forths. The only thing that will resolve this issue once and for all is an election.

Yes, there was a round table meeting before now, but it was inconclusive. If a proposition is made and one party still disagrees, then we must go to the polls.

The election is what determines who wins and who loses. We just want everything to be transparent. We want an election, not a selection.

Stakeholders want to participate in choosing who leads them for the next four years. Disenfranchising any group will not sit well with the gymnastics community.

We need peace and harmony in the next administration, and the only way to achieve that is to allow people to exercise their constitutional right to vote for their preferred candidate.”

Other stakeholders of the Gymnastics Federation of Nigeria echoed the same position, stressing that an election is the only way out of the current logjam.

Dr. Ajibola Samson of the Nigeria Association for Physical, Health Education, Recreation, Sports, and Dance (NAPHER-SD) emphasized that the process must be inclusive, with no group under the federation left out.

Similarly, Richard Jatau (North East Representative), John Abiodun Oyewuwo (South West Representative), and Dr. Oladipo Samuel, a stakeholder from Ekiti, expressed disappointment that the GFN election did not hold as scheduled on Saturday.

Continue Reading

news

BREAKING: Tinubu replaces Service Chiefs, names Gen. Oluyede CDS

Published

on

 

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has approved major changes in the leadership of the Armed Forces, appointing new Service Chiefs in a decisive move aimed at strengthening national security architecture.

According to a statement on Friday by his Special Adviser on Media and Public Communication, Chief Sunday Dare, the President named former Chief of Army Staff, Lt. General Olufemi Oluyede as the new Chief of Defence Staff, replacing General Christopher Musa.

Major-General W. Shaibu has been appointed Chief of Army Staff, Air Vice Marshal S.K. Aneke takes over as Chief of Air Staff, while Rear Admiral I. Abbas is the new Chief of Naval Staff.

The Chief of Defence Intelligence, Major-General E.A.P. Undiendeye, retains his position.

All appointments, the statement said, take immediate effect.

President Tinubu, who is also the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, expressed deep appreciation to the outgoing Chief of Defence Staff, General Musa, and other retired Service Chiefs for their “patriotic service and dedicated leadership” during their tenure.

He charged the newly appointed military heads to justify the confidence reposed in them by demonstrating “enhanced professionalism, vigilance, and comradeship” in the discharge of their duties.

The shake-up in the military hierarchy comes as part of ongoing efforts by the Tinubu administration to reposition the security sector, improve coordination among the services, and sustain momentum in the fight against terrorism, banditry, and other security challenges across the country.

Continue Reading

news

JUST IN: Court Rejects “Terrorists’ Negotiator” Tukur Mamu’s Third Bail Application

Published

on

A Federal High Court in Abuja has rejected a fresh application for bail filed by detained alleged terrorists negotiator, Tukur Mohammed Mamu.

Justice Mohammed Umar, in a ruling on Wednesday, noted the health complaint by Mamu and held that the detaining authority, the Department of State Services (DSS) should not release him but take him to an appropriate health facility where he would be adequately attended to.

Justice Umar noted that, by the history of the case so far, the prosecution has exhibited diligence in it handling of the case and exhibited diligence in prosecuting the case.

The judge said one of the reasons for granting bail is where the prosecution is not diligent, noting that since the prosecution in this case is diligent, the application for bail cannot be granted.

He subsequently ordered that the defence lawyer should choose the health facility comfortable to the defendant, to which he should be promptly taken.

He also asked the DSS to allow the defendant access to members of his family.

The ruling on Wednesday is the third time the court will reject his application for bail since his was arraigned on March 21, 2023 by the Federal Government on a 10-count charge bordering on terrorism financing, among others.

Mamu was arrested on September 7, 2022 by Egyptian security officials at the Cairo International Airport, on reasonable suspicion of financing Boko Haram terrorism activities.

He was alleged to have convinced the terrorists to discuss ransom payments with individual families of the hostages of the train attack instead of the Chief of Defense Staff Committee set up by the Federal Government for his personal financial gain.

He was said to have been nominated by the terrorists that attacked the Abuja-Kaduna bound train sometime in March 2022 which took scores of persons hostage.

Mamu was alleged to have collected ransoms on behalf of the Boko Haram terrorists from families of hostages, confirmed the amount and facilitated the delivery of same to the terrorists.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Newsthumb Magazine | All rights reserved